Enji GuardCatch security risks in code produced with Cursor
Cursor can edit across many files quickly. Guard gives those broad AI-assisted changes an independent audit across code, dependencies, tests, and runtime behavior.
1 repo · setup in about 5 minutes · no card, no commitment
01
Agentic editing makes mistakes bigger
When an agent rewrites ten files to satisfy one prompt, a wrong assumption does not stay contained. Cursor is powerful precisely because it moves fast and broad, which is also why broad AI-assisted changes need an independent check.
02
The risks Guard watches for
Guard audits the patterns agentic editing tends to introduce:
- Secrets and keys written into reachable routes
- Auth and access-control checks dropped during a refactor
- Hallucinated or unvetted packages added to satisfy a change
- Tests rewritten to pass instead of to verify
- Inconsistent handling of input across the files it touched
03
Across the repo and the running app
A broad change needs a broad check. Guard combines source review with bounded runtime checks against the approved linked application, so a route changed with Cursor that now answers without auth gets caught, not just code that looks risky in review.
04
Fixes you review and merge
Findings come back as reviewable GitHub issues with evidence and rationale. When a fix is bounded and useful, Guard can open a narrow pull request for human review.
Quick questions
How do I audit code generated with Cursor?
Connect the GitHub repo Cursor commits to. Guard audits the changes across code, dependencies, tests, and the linked running app, then returns findings as reviewable GitHub issues, no IDE plugin required.
What security risks does Cursor-generated code introduce?
The most common are secrets written into reachable routes, auth or access-control checks dropped during a broad refactor, hallucinated or unvetted packages, and tests rewritten to pass rather than to verify.
Does it slow Cursor down or change my workflow?
No. Guard runs out of band on a schedule through a revocable GitHub App. You keep using Cursor; Guard audits the result and only opens issues or pull requests a person reviews.
Can Guard open the fixes as pull requests?
Yes. When a fix is bounded and useful, Guard opens a narrow pull request with evidence and rationale. Nothing merges on its own, a person reviews and approves.
Verify what Cursor wrote.
Connect a repo and get your first audit report in a few minutes. No card.