Enji GuardCatch security risks in code produced with GitHub Copilot
Code accepted from Copilot can still contain insecure patterns, hallucinated packages, and weak tests. Guard audits the resulting repo and linked app before those risks reach production.
1 repo · setup in about 5 minutes · no card, no commitment
01
Autocomplete speed, autocomplete risk
Copilot suggests the most likely next code, learned from public repositories that include insecure examples. Accept the suggestion that looks right and you can ship a leaked secret or a missing auth check without noticing.
02
The risks Guard watches for
Guard audits the patterns Copilot tends to introduce:
- Secrets and keys completed straight into reachable code
- Authentication and access-control checks that never run
- Packages suggested that do not exist or are unmaintained
- Tests that pass without proving anything
- Untrusted input flowing into queries and commands
03
Across the repo and the running app
Static review alone misses what only shows at runtime. Guard combines source review with bounded runtime checks against the approved linked application, so a Copilot-assisted route that answers without auth in production gets caught.
04
Fixes in your normal flow
Findings come back as reviewable GitHub issues with evidence and rationale. When a fix is bounded and useful, Guard can open a narrow pull request for human review.
Quick questions
How do I audit code generated with GitHub Copilot?
Connect the GitHub repo Copilot suggests into. Guard audits the resulting code across security, dependencies, tests, and the linked running app on a schedule, then returns findings as reviewable GitHub issues, no IDE plugin required.
What security risks does Copilot-generated code introduce?
Common ones are hardcoded secrets, insecure defaults copied from training data, missing input validation, and suggested packages that do not exist and can be registered by attackers.
Does Guard change how my team uses Copilot?
No. Guard runs out of band through a revocable GitHub App. Your team keeps using Copilot; Guard independently audits the result and only opens issues or pull requests a person reviews.
Can Guard open the fixes as pull requests?
Yes. When a fix is bounded and useful, Guard opens a narrow pull request with evidence and rationale. Nothing merges on its own, a person reviews and approves.
Verify what Copilot wrote.
Connect a repo and get your first audit report in a few minutes. No card.