Enji GuardAI code review that keeps checking after the pull request
Guard reviews pull requests, but also runs scheduled audits for the issues PR comments miss: technical debt, tests, dependencies, security, and runtime behavior.
1 repo · setup in about 5 minutes · no card, no commitment
01
Guard vs ordinary AI review tools
Most automated code review tools fire once, on the diff, and go quiet. They see the lines that changed, not the debt those lines add to the whole repo. Guard reviews the PR and keeps auditing the codebase on a schedule.
02
Review feedback where it belongs
On a pull request, Guard leaves focused, senior-level comments: real risks, not style nags. Signal over noise, so reviewers trust it instead of muting it.
03
Scheduled repo audits
Risk does not only arrive in PRs. Dependencies rot, tests decay, secrets slip in through config. Guard re-audits the whole repo on a schedule and catches what review-on-diff never sees.
04
The verification bottleneck is the new constraint
AI made writing code cheap and reviewing it the bottleneck. Reviewers drown in agent-generated PRs and start rubber-stamping. Guard is the independent layer that keeps verification from collapsing under volume.
05
A remediation loop, not just comments
Findings come back as reviewable GitHub issues with evidence and rationale. When a fix is bounded and useful, Guard can open a narrow pull request for human review.
PR-only reviewer vs Enji Guard
| PR-only reviewer | Enji Guard | |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews each pull request | ||
| Audits the whole repo on a schedule | ||
| Security (SAST) context across the repo | ||
| Dependency / SCA checks for hallucinated packages | ||
| Runtime / DAST checks on the live app | ||
| Findings as GitHub issues | PR comments only | |
| Opens remediation pull requests | ||
| Self-hosted & bring-your-own-AI |
Quick questions
Will this let us merge AI-written PRs without a human reviewing them?
No, and that is on purpose. Guard adds a second set of eyes and catches what diff-level review misses, but a person still approves and merges. It removes rubber-stamping, not the reviewer.
Does it only work on GitHub, or also GitLab and Bitbucket?
Guard is built around the GitHub App today: it reviews pull requests and opens issues or PRs in the same GitHub repo. GitLab and Bitbucket are not supported yet.
What programming languages does it review?
Guard is not tied to a fixed language list. It reads your repository and stack rather than applying a preset ruleset, so it works across languages and frameworks instead of a short supported list.
Do I still need a separate PR review bot?
If your need is GitHub PR comments, Guard can cover that workflow. Some teams still keep a specialized policy bot; Guard's difference is that it also runs scheduled repo audits after the PR is gone.
Is there a free way to try it?
Yes. You can connect a repo and run the first audit for free, no card, and see the PR comments and issues before deciding anything.
Review that does not stop at the PR.
Connect a repo and let Guard review pull requests and re-audit new repo versions automatically. No card.