Enji GuardTurn repo audit findings into reviewable pull requests
Guard re-audits the repo, keeps the finding and rationale reviewable, and opens a narrow GitHub issue or pull request when a fix path is useful.
1 repo · setup in about 5 minutes · no card, no commitment
01
Finding problems is not enough
A report of 200 findings is just another backlog nobody clears. Value shows up when a finding becomes a small, reviewed change that lands in main. Guard is built to close that last mile.
02
The narrow-fix model
Guard does not attempt a sweeping refactor. It is automated program repair in a narrow, reviewable form: one safe, high-value fix at a time, scoped tightly enough that a human can review it in minutes and trust what changed.
03
Issues or pull requests, your call
Guard keeps the finding, rationale, and fix path reviewable. Some findings stay as issues for the team to decide; bounded fixes can become pull requests your engineers review and merge.
04
Test-backed remediation
A fix without a test is a guess. Where Guard opens a PR, it brings the change and the verification together, so a green check actually means something.
05
Human review and rollback
Nothing merges on its own. Every change is a normal pull request your team reviews, merges, and can revert. You control what Guard opens and what lands.
Quick questions
Can AI just fix the bugs automatically?
It can propose fixes, but fully automatic merging is the wrong goal for anything risky. Guard opens a fix as a pull request with the reasoning and a test, and a human still approves what lands.
Is this safe to run on a production codebase?
Yes, because nothing changes without review. Every remediation is a normal pull request you can read, reject, or revert, scoped narrowly enough to review in minutes.
Do you aim for zero-touch, hands-off remediation?
No. Zero-touch maintenance is fine for trivia and risky for real changes. Guard keeps remediation low-friction but always reviewable, so a person stays in the loop on anything that matters.
What kinds of fixes can it open on its own?
Bounded, low-risk ones: a small security hardening, a missing test, an agent-doc update, a frontend-performance fix, or a dependency-security bump when the evidence is clear. Anything larger comes back as an issue to plan, not a surprise pull request.
Findings that move toward fixes, under your control.
Connect a repo and get your first code remediation pass in a few minutes. No card.